Recently asked the question about International Observation -- what is my next topic going to be? I thought: well why not just refer to past trends and see what topics are most enticing. So I took a methodological approach which revealed an interesting observation:
Based on my own experience, respondents behavior, the depth of responses received, and the number of responses to postings it became blatantly clear that people are more sensitive and more likely to respond to posts that address Americanization, Westernization, ideology, capitalism, democracy and all of the things that accompany modernization. Morality, ethics, well-being of self and of others (i.e. starving children) has ultimately failed to generate substantial dialogue and/or interest in readers.
The objective of International Observation is to present material based on an observation of international phenomena and the interplay of international relations. Although the method is objective, so too are the readers. Apparently, no matter how ‘real’ the situation is or how scientific the data may be, the reader will seek out anecdotal evidence to support their ideology and force circumstances to ‘fit’ within their worldview, thus rejecting any notion that their worldview might be suspect.
Here, I must note that any connotations regarding globalization or Westernized democracy only receive negative feedback from Americans, yet are praised by a variety of readers that extend to over 300 countries, encompassing over 1000 cities (to date). I find it troubling that this occurs when questioning ideology but not morality, particularly in the United States.